Tag Archives: place value in numbers

Hold a ‘0’ to the light and look through it – there is nothing, and everything

Facebooktwitterlinkedininstagram

Fragment of the Bakhshali manuscript with one of the earliest uses of a dot as place holder, 224-283 AD

Several years ago I read Jerry P. King’s The Art of Mathematics (1992). Chapter 3 deals with Numbers, and in it is a statement that has bothered me ever since “Although they are the most fundamental of mathematical objects, the natural numbers are not found in nature.” There are real numbers, but none exist in the natural universe. We may count two people, write the number on a piece of paper, or solve an equation that gives the answer as two, but the number ‘two’ does not exist – we cannot pick it up or put it under a microscope. I have kept an eye out for ‘one’, but even this basic singularity is elusive. Numbers, it seems, are an abstraction.

So where does this leave ‘zero’? Zero means nothing, zilch, emptiness; so is it even a natural number – is it an integer? Several commentators of mathematics and science have suggested Continue reading

Facebooktwitterlinkedininstagram
Facebooktwitterlinkedin